SCHD vs VYM vs VIG: The Ultimate Dividend ETF Comparison 2026
Compare SCHD (quality dividend growth), VYM (high yield), and VIG (dividend appreciation). Analyze yields, sector exposure, expense ratios, and which dividend strategy fits your goals.
The Dividend ETF Showdown
Dividend investing is having a moment. After years of growth stocks dominating, investors are rediscovering the appeal of companies that pay you to own them.
Three dividend ETFs dominate the conversation: SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity), VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield), and VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation). They all focus on dividends, but their approaches are very different.
Let's break down each one and figure out which fits your goals.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | SCHD | VYM | VIG |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strategy | Quality + Dividend | High Current Yield | Dividend Growth |
| Index | Dow Jones Dividend 100 | FTSE High Dividend Yield | S&P Dividend Growers |
| Holdings | ~100 | ~550 | ~340 |
| Expense Ratio | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.06% |
| Current Yield | ~3.5% | ~3.2% | ~1.8% |
| AUM | ~$60 Billion | ~$55 Billion | ~$85 Billion |
| Focus | Quality fundamentals | Highest yielders | 10+ yr dividend growth |
SCHD: Quality Dividend Growth
SCHD has become the internet's favorite dividend ETF. It focuses on companies with strong fundamentals AND solid dividends - the best of both worlds.
How SCHD Selects Stocks
SCHD uses a multi-factor approach:
- Dividend history: Must have paid dividends for 10+ consecutive years
- Cash flow to total debt: Financial strength measure
- Return on equity: Profitability measure
- Dividend yield: Current income
- 5-year dividend growth rate: Growing payouts
The result is a portfolio of financially strong companies that pay attractive dividends AND grow them over time.
SCHD Top 10 Holdings
| Rank | Company | Weight | Sector | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AbbVie | 4.5% | Healthcare | 3.6% |
| 2 | Coca-Cola | 4.4% | Consumer Staples | 2.9% |
| 3 | Cisco Systems | 4.3% | Technology | 2.8% |
| 4 | Broadcom | 4.2% | Technology | 1.5% |
| 5 | Home Depot | 4.1% | Consumer Disc. | 2.4% |
| 6 | Verizon | 4.0% | Communication | 6.4% |
| 7 | Chevron | 3.9% | Energy | 4.2% |
| 8 | PepsiCo | 3.8% | Consumer Staples | 2.7% |
| 9 | Merck | 3.7% | Healthcare | 2.5% |
| 10 | Texas Instruments | 3.6% | Technology | 2.9% |
SCHD Key Characteristics
- Concentrated: Only ~100 holdings (vs 500+ for others)
- Quality focus: Strong balance sheets and profitability
- Balanced yield: 3.5% yield - high but not extreme
- Good growth: Holdings tend to grow dividends consistently
- Tax efficient: Mostly qualified dividends
VYM: High Dividend Yield
VYM takes a simpler approach: own the highest-yielding large-cap stocks. If you want maximum current income, VYM delivers.
How VYM Selects Stocks
VYM's methodology is straightforward:
- Start with large-cap U.S. stocks
- Rank them by dividend yield
- Select the top 50% by yield
- Weight by market cap
There's no quality screen. If a company has a high yield, it's in - regardless of why the yield is high (sometimes yields are high because the stock price crashed).
VYM Top 10 Holdings
| Rank | Company | Weight | Sector | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JPMorgan Chase | 3.9% | Financials | 2.3% |
| 2 | Broadcom | 3.4% | Technology | 1.5% |
| 3 | ExxonMobil | 3.2% | Energy | 3.4% |
| 4 | Johnson & Johnson | 2.9% | Healthcare | 3.0% |
| 5 | Procter & Gamble | 2.5% | Consumer Staples | 2.3% |
| 6 | Home Depot | 2.3% | Consumer Disc. | 2.4% |
| 7 | AbbVie | 2.2% | Healthcare | 3.6% |
| 8 | Merck | 2.1% | Healthcare | 2.5% |
| 9 | Chevron | 2.0% | Energy | 4.2% |
| 10 | Bank of America | 1.9% | Financials | 2.5% |
VYM Key Characteristics
- Diversified: ~550 holdings across all sectors
- Simple approach: Just screens for yield, no quality filters
- Higher financial exposure: Banks and insurers are often high yielders
- Value tilt: High yield stocks tend to be value stocks
- Some yield traps: May include stocks with unsustainably high yields
VIG: Dividend Appreciation
VIG takes a completely different approach: it doesn't care about current yield. Instead, it focuses on companies with long track records of GROWING their dividends.
How VIG Selects Stocks
VIG's methodology prioritizes dividend growth history:
- Must have raised dividends for 10+ consecutive years
- Excludes the top 25% highest yielders (they might cut)
- Excludes REITs
- Weights by market cap
The philosophy: a company that has raised its dividend every year for a decade is likely to continue doing so. Low current yield is fine if it grows every year.
VIG Top 10 Holdings
| Rank | Company | Weight | Sector | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Microsoft | 5.2% | Technology | 0.8% |
| 2 | Apple | 4.8% | Technology | 0.5% |
| 3 | Broadcom | 3.9% | Technology | 1.5% |
| 4 | JPMorgan Chase | 3.5% | Financials | 2.3% |
| 5 | UnitedHealth | 3.2% | Healthcare | 1.4% |
| 6 | Visa | 2.8% | Financials | 0.8% |
| 7 | Mastercard | 2.5% | Financials | 0.6% |
| 8 | Home Depot | 2.3% | Consumer Disc. | 2.4% |
| 9 | Johnson & Johnson | 2.2% | Healthcare | 3.0% |
| 10 | Procter & Gamble | 2.1% | Consumer Staples | 2.3% |
VIG Key Characteristics
- Growth-oriented: Includes Apple, Microsoft, Visa - growth stocks with growing dividends
- Low current yield: Only ~1.8% - lowest of the three
- High quality bias: Companies that grow dividends tend to be well-managed
- More growth potential: Holdings have better earnings growth prospects
- Less value exposure: Avoids the "yield trap" stocks
Head-to-Head Comparison
Complete Metrics Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | VYM | VIG |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.06% |
| Current Yield | 3.5% | 3.2% | 1.8% |
| 5-Year Dividend Growth | 12.5% | 6.8% | 10.2% |
| Holdings Count | ~100 | ~550 | ~340 |
| P/E Ratio | 16x | 15x | 22x |
| Beta | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.92 |
| Dividend Frequency | Quarterly | Quarterly | Quarterly |
Income Generation ($100,000 Portfolio)
| Fund | Current Annual Income | Income in 10 Years* |
|---|---|---|
| SCHD | $3,500 | $11,600 |
| VYM | $3,200 | $6,100 |
| VIG | $1,800 | $5,200 |
*Projected based on historical dividend growth rates. Not guaranteed.
SCHD wins on both current yield AND dividend growth, which is why it's become so popular.
Sector Exposure Analysis
Each fund has very different sector exposures:
Sector Weights Comparison
| Sector | SCHD | VYM | VIG | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | 12% | 10% | 24% | 31% |
| Financials | 18% | 22% | 18% | 13% |
| Healthcare | 16% | 14% | 15% | 12% |
| Consumer Staples | 14% | 12% | 10% | 6% |
| Industrials | 15% | 10% | 14% | 9% |
| Energy | 8% | 9% | 2% | 4% |
| Consumer Disc. | 6% | 6% | 8% | 10% |
| Communication | 5% | 6% | 3% | 9% |
| Utilities | 3% | 6% | 3% | 2% |
| Materials | 2% | 3% | 2% | 2% |
| Real Estate | 1% | 2% | 1% | 2% |
Key Sector Observations
- VIG has the most tech: Includes Apple, Microsoft, Visa - closest to S&P 500
- VYM is heavy on financials: Banks and insurers are yield-focused
- SCHD is balanced: Good mix across defensive and cyclical sectors
- All are underweight tech: Compared to S&P 500's 31% tech weight
- All are overweight healthcare/staples: Traditional dividend sectors
Historical Performance
Annualized Returns
| Period | SCHD | VYM | VIG | S&P 500 (VOO) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Year | 12.5% | 14.8% | 18.2% | 25.3% |
| 3 Years | 8.2% | 7.5% | 9.8% | 10.1% |
| 5 Years | 12.8% | 10.5% | 12.2% | 14.5% |
| 10 Years | 11.5% | 9.8% | 11.2% | 12.6% |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
| Metric (10yr) | SCHD | VYM | VIG |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Deviation | 16.2% | 16.8% | 15.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -25% | -28% | -24% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.71 | 0.58 | 0.72 |
| Upside Capture | 85% | 80% | 90% |
| Downside Capture | 75% | 82% | 78% |
SCHD and VIG have delivered better risk-adjusted returns than VYM. They capture more upside while limiting downside better.
Performance in Different Markets
| Market Environment | Best Performer | Worst Performer |
|---|---|---|
| Tech Rally (2023) | VIG | VYM |
| Rising Rates (2022) | SCHD | VIG |
| Value Rotation (2021) | SCHD | VIG |
| COVID Crash (2020) | VIG | VYM |
| Low Rates (2019) | VIG | VYM |
Which Strategy Fits You?
Choose SCHD If:
- You want balance: Good current yield AND dividend growth
- Quality matters: You prefer companies with strong fundamentals
- Building wealth: You're accumulating and reinvesting dividends
- Moderate income need: 3.5% yield is enough for your goals
- Value-conscious: You like the lower P/E ratio
- Internet recommendation: Reddit and Twitter love SCHD (for good reason)
Choose VYM If:
- Maximum diversification: 550+ holdings vs SCHD's 100
- Simplicity: Straightforward high-yield approach
- Financial sector exposure: You want more banks and insurers
- Already retired: Need reliable income now, less concerned about growth
- Deep value tilt: Comfortable owning beaten-down high yielders
Choose VIG If:
- Growth + dividends: Want exposure to Apple, Microsoft, Visa
- Long time horizon: 15+ years until you need income
- Total return focus: Current yield matters less than growth
- Less income tax: Lower yield = less taxable income
- Quality focus: Companies with 10+ years of dividend growth
- Closer to market: VIG acts more like the S&P 500
Decision Matrix
| Your Situation | Best Choice | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Young, accumulating | VIG or SCHD | Growth potential, reinvest dividends |
| Mid-career, building | SCHD | Balance of yield and growth |
| Near retirement | SCHD or VYM | Higher current income |
| In retirement | VYM | Maximum current yield |
| Tax-sensitive | VIG | Lowest taxable yield |
| Want tech exposure | VIG | Includes Apple, Microsoft |
The Bottom Line
All three are excellent dividend ETFs with rock-bottom 0.06% expense ratios. The differences come down to philosophy:
Summary Comparison
| Fund | Philosophy | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| SCHD | Quality companies that pay AND grow dividends | Most dividend investors |
| VYM | Highest yielding large caps | Maximum current income |
| VIG | Companies with long dividend growth streaks | Growth-oriented dividend investors |
My Take
SCHD is the best all-around choice for most people. It offers:
- Attractive current yield (~3.5%)
- Strong dividend growth (12.5% 5-year average)
- Quality companies with solid fundamentals
- Good risk-adjusted returns
- Reasonable valuation (16x P/E)
VIG is excellent if you're young and prioritizing total return over current income. Its tech exposure means better growth potential.
VYM makes sense if you're already retired and need maximum income now, even if growth is slower.
The Combination Approach
Some investors combine these funds:
- 50% SCHD + 50% VIG: Balance of yield and growth
- 70% SCHD + 30% VYM: Higher yield, more diversification
- Equal weight all three: Maximum diversification across strategies
Any of these approaches is reasonable. The most important thing is picking a strategy and sticking with it.
This is not investment advice. Dividend payments are not guaranteed. Past dividend history does not guarantee future dividends. Consider your personal situation before investing.
Recommended for You
SCHD vs VYM vs VIG 2026: Dividend ETF Showdown
Compare top dividend ETFs. Yield, growth, sector exposure, and which dividend strategy fits your goals.
Dividend Aristocrats Guide 2026: 25+ Year Dividend Growth Stocks
Complete guide to Dividend Aristocrats for 2026. Discover stocks with 25+ years of consecutive dividend increases.
Gold Investment Guide 2026: Physical Gold, ETFs & Portfolio Allocation
Complete gold investment guide for 2026. Compare physical gold, GLD ETF, mining stocks, and optimal portfolio allocation strategies.
Treasury Bonds Guide 2026: T-Bills, Notes, TIPS & Bond Ladder Strategy
Comprehensive US Treasury bonds guide for 2026. Learn about T-Bills, Notes, Bonds, TIPS, and how to build a bond ladder.
Related Services
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any financial instruments. All investment decisions must be made at your own responsibility. Forex and cryptocurrency trading carries risk of capital loss.